I recently participated in the Professional Poker Tour (PPT) event at The Mirage in Las Vegas. The PPT is the most recent creation of WPT founder Steve Lipscomb. It is comprised of a series of invitational freeroll events with prize pools of $500,000 each in the first season. They represent one of the first opportunities for players to play in events with significant added money. I believe this will be a growing trend in the near future as television revenues and sponsorship for poker continue to increase.
Ultimately, I managed to break even in the event at The Mirage. I am going to share three hands I played that helped me accomplish that feat. The first is detailed in this column.
Hand No. 1. I drew a tough table for this event. Come to think of it, all the tables were pretty rough, as donkeys weren't invited to the PPT (I may have slipped through the cracks, though). One player in particular whom I had difficulty avoiding was Marcel Luske, who was seated two spots to my right. Marcel is a truly outstanding player, which those who watch much televised poker already know. His feat of back-to-back second-table finishes the past two years at the World Series of Poker is a near impossible task when considering the size of the fields (almost as improbable as, say, two straight final tables in the same event).
In any case, Marcel is extremely aggressive, raising lots of pots, so I knew right away that he was a player I'd have to contend with all day. At the third level ($100-$200 blinds), Marcel limped in from middle position and I made it $900 with the A K
. He called, and everyone else folded. Marcel started the hand with close to $20,000, and I had a bit more than my starting stack of $10,000.The flop arrived with the 8
7
7
. Marcel checked, I bet $1,000, and he called. At this point, I thought he could have a range of hands. Marcel doesn't mind "taking one off" with less than premium values, perhaps allowing him to either make a hand somewhere down the road or try to outplay his opponent. I wasn't yet quite sure where this left me. He could have a small pocket pair, an 8, a 7, a flush draw, a straight draw, or just two overcards.
The turn was the 2. Now, Marcel led for $1,000. Again, this could mean a couple of things. He could be on a draw, betting $1,000 (and hoping I didn't raise) so that I didn't make a larger bet to make it tough on him. Or, he could be betting some sort of pair. At this point, I considered laying down my hand, as I thought a pair was his most likely holding. Also, I thought he'd probably make a slightly larger bet if he were on a pure bluff, making it more difficult for me to call. I decided to call, though, thinking I still may have the best hand. If not, I probably had either six outs (if he had an 8) or nine outs (if he had a pair smaller than sevens).The river brought the J
, completing a backdoor flush. Marcel again bet $1,000. To me, it appeared that he had a pair of eights or something a bit smaller, but the small possibility of a busted draw existed. With $6,100 in the pot, it was going to be difficult for me to fold (he had picked just the right amount for a value bet against my likely hand of ace high). However, I had another thought: Since he probably was either betting a small pair or bluffing, what would happen if I raised to represent a backdoor flush? This certainly would give me a better chance to win the pot, and I thought that unless he had a big hand such as trips, a straight, or a flush, it probably would work. So, I made it $3,000. After the briefest moment of hesitation, Marcel called. I told him, "You got it. I just have A-K." Marcel showed J-8 for jacks and eights to take the pot.
I don't really have a problem with losing $3,000 on the river in this hand. I felt Marcel had me beat, but that his hand wasn't strong enough to stand a raise. Unfortunately, he caught a card that improved his hand on the river, convincing him to call. It was possible that I might put in a raise with A-J or the like on the end, hands that he could beat. Also, Marcel has proven himself to be a great reader of hands and people, so getting made was a possibility, too.
This wasn't the last time that Marcel and I would tangle in this tournament. Next issue, I'll discuss another hand we played, as well as my fatal hand.
John Phan Vol. 18, No. 12
-
Ask Chip and Karina
-
Cappelletti in Atlantic City – Tournament action is growing in Atlantic City
-
The Implied Odds Problem – Utilizing the concept of implied odds in making a calling decision
by Jim Brier
-
Poker on Campus – Interest in poker is growing on college campuses
by Bob Ciaffone
-
An Open Letter to Doyle Brunson – An appeal to lead poker's march into the future
by Roy Cooke
-
Raising the Bar – With Five Final-Table Appearances in 2005, the Current Player of the Year Leader, John Phan is Lighting It Up
-
Will the Stuey Ungar Book Prove Sexton Right Again? A long time in the making
by Greg Dinkin
-
Prediction – Will perfection be maintained in predicting a tournament winner?
-
Book Reports Make Me Feel Like I am Back in School! A fun, entertaining quick-read poker book
by Jan Fisher
-
Professional Poker Tour Hands – Part I – A calculated bluff on the river
-
The Sweet 16 – The National Heads-Up Poker Championship
-
The World Series is Here
by Jeff Shulman
-
Play a Tournament With Me – Part II – The Professional Poker Tour at Bellagio in Las Vegas
-
Failing to Adjust – Failing to adjust your play to your opponents can spell doom
-
Fold Equity – Why Aggressiveness Makes Mathematical Sense – A mathematical look at playing A-K in no-limit hold'em
by Matt Matros
-
The Power Play on the Flop – Examples of utilizing power plays on the flop to win the hand
by Tom McEvoy
-
A $500,000 Challenge Match Against Mimi Tran – Two challenge matches are in the books
-
World Series of Poker, Take I – A tournament experience to remember
by Joe Sebok
-
Bring 'Em On! A unique high-stakes challenge to the public
by Mike Sexton
-
Don't Touch That 'Raise' Button – A common no-limit hold'em sit-and-go tournament error
by Lee H. Jones
-
Running Bad – Maintaining or restoring confidence is important during bad runs
-
Buddha's Third Act – What a guy!
by Max Shapiro
-
The Phenomenon of the No. 1 Starter – Wagering considerations when a team's best pitcher is slated to pitch
by Chuck Sippl
-
The Value of Money – Part II – A look at the value of money when expected value is involved
-
Ten Common and Costly Hold'em Errors, Part I – Common preflop errors in limit hold'em
-
What Does Your Sleep Have to Do With Poker? A variety of poker-related thoughts
by Roy West
-
Poker in Barcelona, Part I – A trip to Gran Casino Barcelona
-
A romp across the European poker landscape with the European Poker Tour
by Brad Willis
-
World Poker Tour Championship – Part III – Ten Men Strong
by Lee Munzer