In the last issue of Card Player, I wrote about a challenge from Andy Beal, a Dallas financier, to a group of the very best poker players in the world, in which he offered to play them in the highest-stakes poker game ever – with pots often in the million-dollar range.
On behalf of that group, Doyle Brunson wrote back suggesting that each side put up $40 million and the winner takes all. That's high-stakes poker! Doyle's open letter appears below. ![]()
|
Las Vegas, Nevada Date: October 2004 To: Andy Beal I'm very surprised at the hostile tone in which you wrote this open letter to us. It doesn't reflect the true character of the man all of us have learned to respect and admire. While I haven't talked to everyone concerned in this, I believe I speak for most. First, I would like to apologize for any "fishermen's tales" that have been told. I know you are aware of the concern we have always had about discussing our game with anyone. I think you are aware of the way the media can distort anything they write about. I personally called you about the two writers wanting to write books on "the big game." After you had me give them your number, it appeared you weren't concerned with privacy any longer. You even wanted one of the writers to be an observer the next time we played. As far as your challenge goes, we concede that you have more money than all of us put together. So, why would we want to get into a $100,000-$200,000 game in which we would be underfunded? We are pros, and we know the disadvantage of this. So, here is what we propose: 1. We will raise a $40 million bankroll and post it along with yours. (Everything is contingent on raising the money, but I think it is very realistic that we can expand and raise it.) 2. We will play 30K-60K. If either side loses half of its post-up money, it can raise the stakes to $50,000-$100,000. There is an old axiom that applies here: Get out the way you got in! 3. We will choose who plays and when. 4. We prefer to play in Vegas, the gambling capital of the world. Most of us live here, and what would we do in Dallas when we weren't playing? This is negotiable. The first three points aren't. Andy, I'm chuckling as I write this closing paragraph. If Bill Gates came to Dallas and wanted to flip coins for $100 million per flip for four hours a day until one of you ran out of money or cried uncle, would you do it? My money says you would decline. Respectfully, Doyle Brunson |
Annie Duke Vol. 17, No. 22
-
Daniel Negreanu Wins Another Championship
by Jeff Shulman
-
Doyle Says, 'Let's Play an $80 Million Freezeout!'
-
Government and Our Game – the Heat is On
by Roy Cooke
-
Tournament of Champions
-
Poker On an Amazing Run
by Mike Sexton
-
Championship Poker at the Plaza – Day One
-
Spirit Mountain Revisited
-
Poker: The Real Deal, by Phil Gordon and Jonathan Grotenstein
by Greg Dinkin
-
Playing the Percentages – Part II: No-Limit Hold'em Tournament Advice
-
It's Not Real, is It?
by Lou Krieger
-
Call the Undertaker
-
The Big All In
-
Tournament Structuring
by Bob Ciaffone
-
Can Players Take Advantage of Mistakes?
-
Football, Poker Converge in Tom Elias Fantasy Football Kickoff Poker Event
by Max Shapiro
-
Making the Transition From Limit Hold'em to No-Limit Hold'em
-
Be Afraid … Be Very Afraid!
by Warren Karp
-
A Worthy Midseason Approach
by Chuck Sippl
-
Making the Deal, or Not
by Lee H. Jones
-
The Annie Duke Story
-
To Fiddle or Not, That is the Question
by Jan Fisher
-
Should You Bet a Scary Turn?
-
A Different Plan of Action Depending on the Opponent
-
A Few Pot-Limit Problems
-
Mystery Shopper
by Max Shapiro
-
Mistakes in Online Draw: Playing Shorts
-
And the Medium Beat Goes On
by Roy West
