Poker Coverage: Poker Legislation Poker Business Poker Tournaments

$50K H.O.R.S.E. Turnout Suffers Without ESPN Coverage

Field Shrinks Considerably in 2009

Print-icon
 

There were a few empty tables in the H.O.R.S.E. area today.There is still plenty of star power at the 2009 $50,000 H.O.R.S.E. world championship — often referred to as the “players’ championship” — but one can’t help but notice the empty tables that sit in the Amazon room.

At the end of registration, the prestigious event featured a field of 95 players. In 2008, 148 players put up the cash to compete in the tournament.

This is the first year in the $50K H.O.R.S.E.’s four-year history that the tournament will not feature any television coverage on ESPN, a move made by the network because the TV ratings for the event were never great.

“The turnout is directly related to ESPN deciding that they weren’t going to film it because it’s not no-limit hold’em at the final table,” said Daniel Negreanu, a member of the Players Advisory Council, a group of poker players who give their input to Harrah’s each year concerning the WSOP schedule. “Next year, we’ll switch it back to no-limit hold’em at the final table, then we’ll have all those extra sponsored players and we’ll be back to 150 if not more next year.

Daniel Negreanu“It’s clear and simple. Make it no-limit hold’em.”

In 2006, the inaugural year of the $50,000 H.O.R.S.E. world championship, the tournament made the controversial transition to no-limit hold’em for the final table. No-limit hold’em, of course, is not one of the five games featured in H.O.R.S.E. (all games are limit — hold’em, Omaha eight-or-better, razz, stud, and stud eight-or-better).

After player complaints, the final table of the $50,000 H.O.R.S.E. world championship returned to the five games for 2007, and has remained that way ever since.

“The PAC (Players Advisory Council) was notified that unless there was no-limit hold’em, (the H.O.R.S.E. event) likely wouldn’t be televised,” said Seth Palansky, WSOP communications director. “The PAC said that it was too prestigious of an event, and they didn’t want to change it back.”

Negreanu said that he fought the PAC’s decision.

“Originally, it was no-limit hold’em at the final table. I designed it that way because I knew it would give them what they wanted,” said Negreanu. “People cannot watch H.O.R.S.E. on television, it’s boring. They asked to make it no-limit hold’em, I guess some people thought it was a bad idea, but I was not one of those people. And guess what, I’m right and they’re wrong, as usual.”

Eli ElezraNot everyone agrees with Negreanu, however. Eli Elezra, a regular at the high stakes mixed games at Bellagio, thinks that no-limit hold’em should never replace the tournament’s original format.

“You have to stay with the H.O.R.S.E. all the way,” said Elezra, who actually wishes the $50k event added a couple more games. “I would definitely go for the eight-game (mixed format) and I already told that to Jennifer (Harman), Barry (Greenstein), and Daniel (Negreanu). Make the $50,000 an eight-game mix, so that no-limit hold’em will be a part of it.”

Elezra believes the added games would definitely increase interest.

“Everybody’s playing pot-limit Omaha online,” said Elezra. “And no-limit hold’em, we know (is popular).”

The eight-game mixed format at the World Series includes all of the games of H.O.R.S.E., along with no-limit hold’em, pot-limit Omaha, and deuce-to-seven triple draw.

Annie Duke, one of only two women playing today’s event (Harman being the other), approves Elezra’s idea of making the $50,000 championship more of a mixed games format, but said she could be open to the idea of making the final table of that event just no-limit hold’em for TV purposes.

Annie Duke“Just make it a mixed game, but include no-limit hold’em and then maybe there’s no-limit hold’em alone at the final table,” said Duke. “But if we start doing everything for TV, it only becomes no-limit hold’em. I think at some point you just have to stand up and say, ‘Yeah, the TV is really good but you have to preserve what poker really is as well.’”

Duke wants the World Series to make a $10,000 H.O.R.S.E. event, and make the $50,000 event a mixed game format, with the possibility of just no-limit hold’em at the final table for TV purposes.

“You just have to stop calling it H.O.R.S.E., which is fine. Make the final table no-limit hold’em, I don’t care,” said Duke. “I just want to make sure that we don’t lose sight of the fact that regardless of whether TV likes it or not, Omaha eight-or-better is a great game, limit stud is a great game, and limit hold’em is a great game.”

Even with the smaller turnout for the $50,000 event, Duke insists that it still deserves the “players’ championship” title.

“When you look around the room, it’s still the best players in the world. I don’t think it’s deteriorated at all,” said Duke. “The people who really feel like they have good equity in this event are going to play anyway. The ones who might have been playing because they have TV bonuses, or some of the sites buy them in but they don’t really feel like this is their game, those are the people that you lose.”

While the drop in turnout in such a prestigious event is noticeable, the World Series has fared quite well in terms of turnouts and prize pools thus far in the 2009 WSOP.

The 2009 World Series has set records in the $1,000 Stimulus Special (most entrants ever outside the main event), the $40,000 no-limit hold’em tournament (largest prize pool outside the main event), the $1,500 Omaha eight-or better tourney (biggest live field ever for such a tournament), the Seniors event (largest field ever for such a tournament), and the $2,500 razz tournament (biggest cash prize ever for a razz tourney).

 
 
 
 

Comments

bmpek
5 years ago

with such a small field this should not be a bracelet event. who voted the big game players as spokepersons for all the little guys?????

 
Reply
 

cchappa
5 years ago

Using that logic, you could also justify recalling all bracelets won in the past with fields of less than 100. That's just silly... not a bracelet event.

 
Reply
 

robtr3
5 years ago

The big game players are also some of the most veteran WSOP players--and, therefore, presumably the best stewards of the sport, its history, and its traditions. That's how they became spokespeople for all the little guys.

 
Reply
 

anchordraw
5 years ago

Because of the way ESPN broadcasts events, you usually never know where the players are at in relation to what their M's are ect, the viewers they are after are the ones that want to see the dramatic hands you see in no-limit with big bluffs and allins. If they had a constant tracker like in football or baseline perhaps running along the bottom of the screen that kept you updated on what the blind were, and stack sizes are at the final table, you could follow the action. but without that info, watching a stud limit hand play out is kinda boring to the average viewer compared to seeing phil unload on some dude for calling with 10-4, or seeing Kid Poker or Kenny Tran make an amazing read.

 
Reply
 

GBC Staff
5 years ago

What does the original contract state about TV coverage? Does ESPN have complete control over the WSOP? Since they will not film or televise the event, will they allow another network do so -- or will they allow anyone with a video camera have access to the tournament?

 
Reply