Poker Coverage: Poker Legislation Poker Business Poker Tournaments

Kentucky Appeals Court Says Don't Touch Domain Names

Seizure Case Ends After Five Months

Print-icon
 

Kentucky Appeals CourtA judge ruled that Kentucky will not be allowed to seize the domain names used to gamble and play poker online there. The Commonwealth was attempting to seize the domain names of 141 companies by using a law that allows it to seize devices used to facilitate gambling.

“We are humbled by this decision and by the overwhelming support received from Internet businesses and free speech organizations everywhere,” said Jeff Ifrah, an attorney acting as part of a team representing the Interactive Gaming Council. “The Court of Appeals has now corrected a fundamental misunderstanding by the trial judge in this proceeding of the nature of the Internet and the legality of online poker in Kentucky.”

The Court of Appeals did not weigh in on whether Kentucky has  jurisdiction to seize the domain names located outside its border. However, it did rule that the domain names are not “gambling devices,” as defined by the law.

This ruling overturns a September ruling by Judge Thomas Wingate, who signed the forfeiture petition as requested by Kentucky officials. The forfeiture hearing was scheduled to take place the first week of December, but was delayed until the Court of Appeals ruled.

The ruling affects all of the sites that were targeted, including Tokwiro’s UltimateBet and Absolute Poker, which decided to succumb to the judge’s pressure and geo-block Kentuckians from accessing its sites in December.

 
 
Tags: poker law

Comments

Bluegrass Poker
over 4 years ago

Just for the record, the Court did not rule that domain names are gambling devices. The Court stated clearly that "We are thus convinced that the trial court erred in concluding that domain names can be construed to be gambling devices subject to forfeiture under KRS 528.100."

The judge who disagreed with the majority said he would rule that the domain names were gambling devices but his opinion is a dissent and not the ruling on the case.

 
Reply
 

TimADugan
over 4 years ago

Hey, does anyone have a link to the full decision?

 
Reply
 

Bluegrass Poker
over 4 years ago

Tim, the PPA has it linked on their site. Here is the link.

http://pokerplayersalliance.org/headlines/2009/01/20/ky-opinion-of-court-of-appeals-on-ky-domain-seizure-case/

 
Reply
 

PokerJoeK
over 4 years ago

Take that KENTUCKY!!!

 
Reply
 

TimADugan
over 4 years ago

Thanks Bluegrass. As a lawyer myself, I can't help but read these things ;)

 
Reply
 
 
 
 

Most Viewed Articles
 

1 World Series Of Poker: Mike Sowers Explains 'Craziest Hand I've Played, Maybe Ever' That Resulted In His Elimination And Dealer Firing
2 World Series Of Poker Legend T.J. Cloutier: 'To Hell With Them' Who Make Fun Of My Craps Play
3 Tony Cousineau On Quest For Win After 56 Cashes At World Series Of Poker: 'I'll Sleep When I Die'
4 Seven Years After Winning Two World Series Of Poker Bracelets At Age 21, Jeff Madsen Not Stressed Anymore About Getting The Third
5 Alexander Kostritsyn Not Too Impressed With His $2.7 Million In Winnings This Year On Full Tilt Poker
6 Mike Matusow Says He Has Finally Recovered After Full Tilt Poker 'Destroyed My Life'
7 Bracelet Winner Barred From World Series Of Poker
8 Poker Player Accidentally Sells Wife's $23,000 Wedding Ring For $10 At Garage Sale
9 PokerStars' Mark Scheinberg To Pay U.S. $50 Million
10 Matt Matros -- Stop The No-Limit Insanity
 
Get-it-delivered-240