Poker In Court: U.S. v. DiCristina Reversed
PPA Calls Ruling 'Unfortunate' But Doesn't Change Poker As Game Of Skill
On Tuesday, a federal court overturned the ruling from U.S. v. Lawrence DiCristina in August 2012, which included testimony that poker is a game of skill, rather than chance.
The lower court had reached a judgment of acquittal in favor of Lawrence DiCristina, setting aside the guilty verdict on a couple of counts related to the Illegal Gambling Business Act, a federal statute. DiCristina was arrested in 2011 and charged and convicted of running an illegal gambling business.
He currently faces up to a decade in prison for spreading a poker game in a Staten Island, New York warehouse while taking a five-percent rake.
DiCristina and a co-defendant pleaded guilty on December 12, 2011, but on May 1, 2012 DiCristina was permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, and the case proceeded to trial.
The lower court run by Judge Jack Weinstein decided to set aside the guilty verdict because it said poker isn’t covered by the IGBA. The federal government appealed the decision.
“Because we find that the plain language of the IGBA covers DiCristina’s poker business, we reverse the judgment of acquittal and remand to the District Court with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict, enter a judgment of conviction on both counts, and proceed with sentencing DiCristina,” the ruling from the higher court stated.
The Poker Players Alliance called the decision “unfortunate” but that the “2nd Circuit clearly did not dispute the district court’s finding that poker is a game of skill,” adding that “this is a key point distinguishing poker from the types of gambling games that Congress and state legislatures have often tried to prohibit. What the court did was conclude that the IGBA doesn’t set forth an independent federal definition of gambling, but instead only incorporates state law.”
In other words, Tuesday’s ruling is bad news for DiCristina, but not so bad for the poker community at large, according to the Poker Players Alliance.
“The PPA stands ready to support Mr. DiCristina should he choose to appeal this decision, and we are committed to working through the judicial and legislative processes to establish a clear definition of gambling based on the predominance test,” the PPA concluded.
|1||Feds 'Looking Into' High-Stakes Poker Player: Report|
|2||Zajmovic Becomes First Ever Female WPT Champion|
|3||Sentencing Delayed For Poker Player Travell Thomas|
|4||Cop Threatened To Kill Poker Player In Home Game|
|5||McGregor Opens As 11:1 Underdog In Mayweather Bout|
|6||The Top Five Reasons To Play At Ignition Poker|
|7||Lucky Chewy: Entered "Hibernation" After Bad Session|
|8||Poker Strategy: What A Check Means|
|9||A Poker Life: Randy Ohel|
|10||Poker Hand of the Week: Ema Zajmovic vs. Eric Afriat|
|1||Dan Cates: Tom Dwan 'Gambled Beyond His Means'|
|2||Las Vegas Strip Area To Lose Poker Room|
|3||Full 2017 WSOP Schedule Announced|
|4||Feds 'Looking Into' High-Stakes Poker Player: Report|
|5||Doug Polk: Five Preflop Mistakes In No-Limit Hold’em|
|6||Another WSOP Bracelet Hits eBay, But This Time For Charity|
|7||Zajmovic Becomes First Ever Female WPT Champion|
|8||Brian Rast Talks About Playing $3 Million Pot|
|9||Poker Bot Crushes Humans In Historic Match|
|10||Seiver: 'Bothers Me When People Love To Blame Poker'|