Poker Coverage: Poker Legislation Poker Business Poker Tournaments

Republican Platform Supports Prohibition Of Online Gambling

Renewing American Values Document Calls For Reversal Of Justice Deparment's Wire Act Clarification

Print-icon
 

Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt RomneyThe Republican Party’s national convention is underway in Tampa, Florida, with Mitt Romney and running mate Rep. Paul Ryan each to be formally nominated on Thursday.

Republican delegates have since signed off on the GOP’s platform, a statement that encompasses the party’s stance on various subjects and issues. Among those mentioned in the “Renewing American Values to Build Healthy Families, Great Schools and Safe Neighborhoods” section, is a brief, but strongly worded statement that takes a hard stance against all forms of online gambling.

Last December, the Department of Justice offered their clarification of the Interstate Wire Act of 1961, stating that the law only applies to sports betting and book making.

However, in a section titled “Making the Internet Family-Friendly,” the GOP called for a reversal of the decision. The statement reads as follows:

“Millions of Americans suffer from problem or pathological gambling that can destroy families. We support the prohibition of gambling over the Internet and call for reversal of the Justice Department’s decision distorting the formerly accepted meaning of the Wire Act that could open the door to Internet betting.”

In May, the White House released a statement of their own, responding to an online petition by the Poker Players Alliance (PPA) calling for the federal licensing and regulation of the online poker industry.

President ObamaPresident Obama’s administration sided with the Department of Justice’s stance on the Wire Act, but felt that online poker regulation was a matter best handled at the state level, not federal.

“The Administration understands that many Americans engage in paid online poker games for entertainment purposes. Online gambling on sporting events or contests violates federal law. The legality of other forms of online gambling is dependent upon the law of the states where the bettor or gambling business is located. It is left to each state to determine whether it wishes to permit such activity between its residents and an online poker business authorized by that state to accept such wagers, but online gambling that is not authorized by state law may also violate federal statutes.”

 
 

Comments

idun215
9 months ago

im voting Democrat a republican took away online gaming (Bush) and another republican is trying to keep it away.

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

It was Obama and specifically his DOJ that "took away" online gaming.

Fools like you will blame Bush for everything. Do you know even know who the current President is and how long he has beenin office?

 
Reply
 

WPS22
9 months ago

The laws that were broken were passed under Bush. Bush signed UIGEA into law.

Without UIGEA, there would have been no Black Friday.

The investigation done by the SDNY began in 2007, long before Obama took office. He can't come into office and halt every investigation thats not to his liking.

I know its hard for you to follow this simple sequence of events. You probably don't even know what laws were broken on BF, or even care. You just want to act like the president pushed a magic button and banned poker.

Then, the Republican party puts banning all online poker in their party platform, and you still try to claim they are the party that is more poker friendly.

 
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

It was Obama and specifically his DOJ that "took away" online gaming.

Fools like you will blame Bush for everything. Do you know even know who the current President is and how long he has beenin office?

 
Reply
 

Hoodwanked
9 months ago

Actually I_P_Freely, you're dead wrong there. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) was introduced by Republican Representative Jim Leach from Iowa, passed the House with overwhelming Republican support, and signed into law by Republican President G.W. Bush. Just because a new president takes office does not mean that the laws enacted by the former president just go away. Those laws are still there and must still be enforced.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Friday_(2011)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawful_Internet_Gambling_Enforcement_Act
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/109-2006/h363

 
 

KINGTITAN
7 months ago

I think most Americans don't understand or forgot how the legislative system works. The president doesn't make the laws, the members of Congress (house of reps and Senators) do. The real elections are the ones, most Americans don't pay attention too, Congressmen and Senators. Wake up, and understand how our government works. Then make an educated comment. All this was taught to you (or should have) in high school. So instead of voting on party lines, try to educate yourself on the issues and how your local House Rep voted on past issues. Keep in mind that your local News programs are very biased to their view. Please think for yourself, and not be a sheep to the media.

 
Reply
 

WPS22
9 months ago

I bet bmpek and all the other conservative nutjobs who post here are excited about this news.

Incidentally, banning online poker is the only part of the Republican platform that acknowledges that we are now in the 21st century.

 
Reply
 

trentbridge
9 months ago

" (Casino owner) Sheldon Adelson and his wife, Miriam, along with other family donations, have already reached $36 million, including $10 million to the Romney-backing super PAC Restore Our Future that was reported this week." Huff Post 6/16/2012

Apparently "problem" gambling in real bricks and mortar casinos doesn't destroy millions of families! How else can the GOP justify taking millions from a real US casino billionaire? (Note: Not sure if that description also includes the lovable "birther" Donald Trump?) So, kids, it's okay if Daddy spends his day in a casino because it's only when I play poker on my PC that I'm destroying family life! Happy birthay, Amanda!

 
Reply
 

clunker
9 months ago

Here come the morals police. They want smaller government where it pertains to them in their businesses{businesses are people according to Romney]. But they want to tell people how they should lead their personel lives[who you can marry, what a women can do with her body] If they were not hypocrites they would pass laws out lawing tobacco,booze,fast food and any thing else that hurts us. Back to the dark ages.

 
Reply
 

bmpek
9 months ago

ok all you liberal wing nuts. platforms mean nothing as far as legislative laws that are enacted, you have had harry reed leading the democratic senate for six years what has that got you.when harry gets the right amount of grease applied you will have a national program. you would be very smart to get a republican senate and poker would probably pass with no problem.stop being drones for pokerstars and think for your selfs

 
Reply
 

WPS22
9 months ago

If they mean nothing why do they even exist?

Platforms are winks to special interests groups that support either party. A lot of the stuff put in the platform will never go into law, but it doesn't mean the GOP doesn't want it to.

It is a window into exactly what the party wants to do. Sure, they won't be able to achieve it all, it still matters. If they end up w/ all 3 branches, theres no reason for us to believe they won't try to enact their platform.

Most of it is far scarier than banning online poker too.

 
Reply
 

ianschwartz9
9 months ago

were all screwed if obama gets back in office. wants to bring us down, then the country will have even less jobs, so less fish will bring their money to online poker, which will obviously be back within a year based on the recent court rulings. obama is the most anti american person , its a shame we made such a mistake, BTW his administration shut down the sites in the first place !!

 
Reply
 

YeeDoggy
9 months ago

If Republicans outlaw online poker, how will fish bring money to the table?

 
Reply
 

blegend
9 months ago

Either Obama will be President again or Romney will be. This country is so screwed it's ridiculous.

 
Reply
 

L2K4FC
9 months ago

The GOP wants more freedom in areas of business. That is the bottom line. That is also the only place they want more freedom.

Is America the land of the free or not? Pretty simple question. The GOP vision as shown during this campaign contains a pretty simple answer too, it's "No".

No Poker. No abortion for victims of rape or women who are in mortal danger while giving birth. No regulations for shady business practices [that they are conveniently involved in]. No affordable health care. No Social Security. No freedom of thought. No end to worldwide military conflict. No evolution taught in schools. No no no no no. They ought to just change their name to the NOFA party. No freedom for Americans.

 
Reply
 

x19
9 months ago

Both Obama and Romney are worthless and will only try to be vague however Romney has effectively marginilized himself and pretty much put the nail in the coffin with this "holy roller" approach.....we are screwed as a country if either one of them gets elected.

 
Reply
 

Bryce
9 months ago

Wow, shocker, the douche bag republicans think that poker is the same thing as as betting red or black on the roulette wheel. Do we really need a statement from them about that? And to IP freely-----you're such a typical republican idiot. It's truly a shame that your misguided and generally incorrect interpretation of information is even allowed to be posted on here. Oh yeah , this is america though, where even donks like you get a voice! Republicans know one word and one word only-----ME-----. And to ianshwartz9 ----you're a donk too! The investigation into the poker sites began long before January 2009 donk! And even if the president(republican or democrat) wanted to , he can't order the justice department to stop investigating something that is unlawful just because he/she might disagree with it. Look at the dispensary issue as a perfect example. He told them to lay-off the dipensaries, but did they? Hell no, the're busting them left and right for any little thing they can come up with in Colorado and Cali! The feds have had a giant hard-on for online poker ever since it blew up in 2003, thanks to Moneymaker. Whether it had been Obabma or McCain elected, the EXACT same thing would of happened. Why? Because the're not getting their cut of course. L2K4FC is spot on! Only thing they care about is how to make more money this quarter than they did during the last one. And they truly could care less how many peoples around the world they have to squash to accomplish that goal. But all you republicans don't have a thing to worry about when Obama gets re-elected, because you have your omnipotent being up there watching out for you. LOL

 
Reply
 

KINGTITAN
7 months ago

There is a game the cops play in jailhouse around the country. They pit different races against each other. The reason they do this, is Simple. It makes the inmates fight against each other, not against the cops. This technique is very effective in minimizing the violence against the police. The politicians play the same game. Don't be the fool..

 
Reply
 

WPS22
9 months ago

I love how if you look down the line, all the big conservatives are the biggest trolls here. IPfreely, bmpek, they are literally the most angry, useless posters on this site.

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

For the last the U.S. has had a Democrat President, a Democratic-controlled Senate, and for 2 of the 4 years a Democratic-controlled House.

If the Democrats want their online poker they can have it...after all, they've controlled the federal government for the past 4 years.

Why are they so angry all the time?

 
Reply
 

YeeDoggy
9 months ago

Why does it matter if Obama and the Democrats shut-down online poker when the Republicans agree with the decision?

At least Obama and the Democrats are willing to honor the courts decision that poker is a skill game that allows legislation to bring it back.

Republican won't do that. Why would anyone whose livelihood is online poker support a party that wants to take their livelihood away?

 
Reply
 

clunker
9 months ago

Freely "It was Obama and his DOJ that took away online gaming." NO NO NO. Unless you think that a law passed by a previous administration should not be enforced. According to you the sitting administration should ignore laws passed by the previous administration that you do not agree with. A little history maybe in order. Sept. 30,2006 SAFE Ports bill is passed. This bill was passed with only 2 nay votes because of the national security implications {certain moral police Republicans at the last hour attached the UIGEA bill to this must pass bill}. BUSH signed this bill into law on Oct 13,2006. The banks and money institutions were then given a period of time to put together a plan to shut off the money going to online gambling sites. On Jan. 19,2009 Pres. BUSH as one of his last acts as president{Jan. 20,2009 he became Ex-Pres BUSH} signed into law the banking laws governing money and online gaming which banks had to comply with by Dec. 1st 2009. So unless you are advocating the government should not follow the law you have to admit it was BUSH BUSH BUSH who in reality along with Leach,Fist and Kyl all Republicans who took away your online gaming.

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

Who has been President for the past 3 3/4 years? And what has he done for online poker in that time?

Like I asked: Democrats have control of everything they want....why are they so angry?

 
Reply
 

L2K4FC
9 months ago

Naive reasoning here by I_P_. Democrats don't have control of everything they want and you know it. How about finding an argument that has some meat behind it as opposed to this sleight of hand?

I don't recall seeing Online Poker as a high priority on Obama's agenda but that really isn't the point, is it? AS Clunker clearly illustrated in his last post this law was jammed down the throats of Americans like a lot of other laws that the mainstream citizen would never approve of.

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

Your stale excuses get old. Why can't you answer the questions:
Who has been President for the past 3 1/2 years?
What has he done for online poker in that time?

 
 

L2K4FC
9 months ago

Did you read the first sentence of my second paragraph? I plainly stated that online poker was not a high priority on Obama's agenda. And I don't blame him or any other democrat for that. There are bigger issues at play in society that deserve more attention. That said, I highly doubt that he would have received any support from the NOFA party had Obama made it a priority to get online poker going again. More likely, a healthy dose of fanatical filibustering as in so many other cases.

Was that clear enough?

 
 

clunker
9 months ago

The Federal government has more or less said the states can do what they want as far as online poker is concerned. And if you think the President should be wasting time trying to convince the morals police about online gaming when they can't have an intelligent discussion about jobs your way off base.

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

L2 you seem to be unable to provide direct answers to direct questions.

I will try one more time:

(1) Who has been the President for the past 3 1/2 years?

(2) What has he done for online poker in that time? Please provide a direct answer. Not "Bush Bush Bush". Not "Yes we can". Not your opinion about stuff that might happen. Just facts. Only facts. Please enumerate the thing(s) this President has done and what were the result(s).

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

You got nothing, huh? That's what I thought.

 
Reply
 

L2K4FC
9 months ago

Once again you assumed incorrectly. I've been out having a life while you've been arguing on the internet.

Now I have a few questions for you:

1. Whose administration proposed and passed the UIGEA?

2. What proof do you have that Obama's administration would have passed this law had it not been passed by the time he took office?

3. What President in the history of the United States has ever reversed such an action? I'm looking at the big picture here, not just repealing a law. I'm talking about a situation where there is an active and ongoing multiple LE agency, multiple jurisdiction investigation and prosecution based on the UIGEA.

Your problem is that you like to oversimplify the issues and bark at people instead of have a true debate. I don't really have the time to hold your hand through the critical thinking process but I'll make you this deal: If you can answer all of my questions then I'll answer yours.

 
 

clunker
9 months ago

What have Republicans done the last 7 years IP. Well they did in a back door underhanded way pass the UIGEA the law that took away your right to play online poker{Fist,Leach Kyl and BUSH BUSH BUSH]. And now even though the plat form is not always adhered to they have thought it important enough to include that they will not allow online poker. You are the one with nothing if you want to keep deluding yourself that these people are going to allow you this right.

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

It appears that you have the same reading comprehension problem that L2 has.

Try to see if you can answer the questions. With facts.

1. Who has been the President for the past 3 1/2 years?

2. What has he done for online poker in that time? Please list the thing(s) he has done and what were the result(s)?

 
Reply
 

clunker
9 months ago

This is and act of futility since you refuse to accept the obvious. I understand and comprehend what happened while you refuse to accept the facts. The Obama DOJ enforced the laws that were on the books when he took office{which BUSH BUSH BUSH signed into law the last day he was in office]. There are many more important problems facing America then you being able to sit in front of your computer in your underwear losing money or winning money. Mitch McConnell has made it quite clear the Republicans are willing to destroy the USA if it will make Obama a 1 term President and you think they are going to let you play online poker your totally irrational.

 
Reply
 

Donald3
9 months ago

HELLO! Does it really matter who signed what into law. It is your over-all government who did it. They both freakin did it. OK? Now, Moving forward (not the Obama forward either). We All as poker players must act as "ONE" moving forward. We must show that online poker is NOT as bad as everyone says it is. That the Debt of this country can be reduced with money from poker players them selves. How can you do this you ask? Get everyone that you can to sign up for Poker Players Alliance. Seriously people! When you go to your local poker rooms wear anything you can with Poker Players Alliance. Talk about it...Move it Forward! Call your Representatives, Congressman...the President current or otherwise. Don't divide us as poker players on who is a better president. One thing about poker players is...We Stick Together! Now is the time to Stick Together.

 
Reply
 

I_P_Freely
9 months ago

Donald, you seem like a smart guy. Maybe you can answer my two questions since clunker and L2 cannot answer them.

By the way I would not recommend loudly recruiting for the PPA at your local poker room. Almost all local poker rooms have seen an increase in business since U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, appointed by Obama in August 2009, misapplied the UIGEA to prosecute online poker sites and payment preocessors (Bharara believes poker is a game of chance, not skill). Some of these local poker rooms will be okay with your recruiting as they believe online poker generates new customers for them. But others will not be okay with it as they believe it takes their customers away. I would perhaps check with the cardroom manager first.

 
Reply
 

xIcemanxx
7 months ago

the UIGEA never made poker illegal, only using credit and debit cards to process payments illegal. If stars and tilt had restricted all deposits to W. Union or Moneygram they would still be running here.

 
Reply
 
 
 
 

Most Viewed Articles
 

1 Online Poker Scandal: Annie Duke Responds To Leaked Russ Hamilton Audio Recording
2 Dan Shak Finishes Second In Tiger Woods' Charity Poker Tournament In Las Vegas
3 A Poker Life -- Brian Hastings
4 Jamie Gold's World Series of Poker Main Event Bracelet Up For Auction
5 High-Stakes Online Poker: Gus Hansen Wins $1.7 Million This Week
6 Doyle Brunson Bows Out Of World Series Of Poker
7 Final Table Set In European Poker Tour €100,000 Super High Roller
8 Tiger Woods To Host Poker Tournament In Las Vegas
9 Gambling Lawsuit: Did Ivey Notice Defective Cards At London Casino En Route To Winning $12 Million?
10 Ultimate Bet Cheating: Russ Hamilton Admits In Audio Recording, 'I Did Take This Money'
 
Get-it-delivered-240