Poker Coverage: Poker Legislation Poker Business Poker Tournaments

House Holds Hearing on Safety of Internet Poker

'Feisty Debate' Addresses Concerns About Protecting Consumers

Print-icon
 

A Tuesday hearing — titled Internet Gaming: Is There a Safe Bet? — in front of a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee addressing online poker and Rep. Joe Barton’s (R-Texas) bill was a “feisty debate,” according to Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee). Testimony from a number of experts (full list on hearing’s website) tackled some of the concerns levied by members of Congress.

Committee member Barton, referred to as the “best poker player in Congress” by one of his colleagues, hammered home the point that nothing will stop millions of Americans from playing online poker, regardless of whether or not the federal government intervenes.

When the alleged crimes of Full Tilt Poker were mentioned, former New York Sen. Al D’Amato, whose Poker Players Alliance received funds from members of the company, replied, “The way to deal with Full Tilt Poker and people who break the rules is to provide a tough system. This [industry] cries out for regulation.”

An exchange between Parry Aftab, Board of Advisors Chairman for FairPlayUSA, and Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Florida) covered some of the concerns about age verification in a licensed and regulated market. Aftab said that the tools are available to prevent adults under 21 from playing on the Internet.

The fear of computerized players in the game was expressed by members of the subcommittee. Kurt Eggert, speaking on behalf of consumer protection, said that there is “no way to prevent guidance from a bot,” and that there are “international competitions now to design the best poker playing bot.” Aftab said that there could be data sharing between web poker providers to help spot cheating patterns.

Eggert referenced the game of chess in his testimony, suggesting that online poker could benefit from a rating system that would allow players to gauge the skill level of their opponent.

Arguably the most passionate testimony was given by D’Amato when he cited the problems with Prohibition early in the 20th century. He said that a similar practice now against online poker will not be effective.

The hearing was closed by Chairwoman Mary Bono Mack (R-California) saying that Congress needs to “consider what is best for American consumers.”

The next step in the process is for those who gave testimony to field questions over the next 10 business days. A followup hearing has not yet been scheduled. Barton’s bill was referred to the subcommittee in late June.

For those who missed the hearing, the video coverage is archived here.

 
 
 
 

Comments

higonp
almost 3 years ago

Ban data mining and the bot problem is solved. The moron consumer protection "bot expert" advocated the exact opposite, he thinks posting player info so you can avoid good players is smart. Idiot! player info is what bots need. They know all your tendencies from data bases of info the sites have been allowing other sites to mine for years. Ban data mining!

 
Reply
 

GordonGejko
almost 3 years ago

The best thing to protect amateur players is to take away HUD and block data bases such as OPR.

Also apply federal whistle blower laws and IRS bonuses (10% of penalty imposted). If players can make money turning other players in for cheating they will and is probably best way to enforce collusion and other cheating.

Players then have to rely on their own notes.

Ranking system terrible idea.

 
Reply
 

whitemcky
almost 3 years ago

Why does Marsha Want Congress to Regulate the Internet? Why not just say NO FEDERAL branch (the FCC and congress and the federal courts included) has any authority to decide or rule on any aspect concerning the Internet?

BUT Marsha Blackburn did Vote FOR: Patriot Act Reauthorization, Electronic Surveillance, Funding the REAL ID Act (National ID), Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, Thought Crimes “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, Warrantless Searches, Employee Verification Program, Body Imaging Screening, Patriot Act extension; and only NOW she is worried about free speech, privacy, and government take over of the internet?

Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman.
See her “blatantly unconstitutional” votes at :
http://mickeywhite.blogspot.com/2009/09/tn-congressman-marsha-blackburn-votes.html
Mickey

 
Reply
 
 
 

Most Viewed Articles
 

1 Former Roulette Dealer Faces Criminal Charges For Telling Gambler About 'Lucky Number'
2 Real-Money Online Poker Coming To California This Month, Tribal Gaming Regulator Says
3 Dan Cates Reaches $10M In Profits Playing Online Poker
4 Poker Strategy With Ed Miller: Are You Running Bad Or Playing Bad?
5 Lynne Mitchnick, Former Backer Of Poker Pro Lee Childs, Gives Her Side Of The Lawsuit
6 Olivier Busquet Wins European Poker Tour Barcelona €50,000 Super High Roller
7 Poker Strategy With Alan Schoonmaker: Why You Can't Beat Low Limit Games
8 'Invisible Ink' Poker Cheat Banned From Connecticut Casinos
9 Report: Bag Of Revel Money Goes Missing After Apparently Falling Off Armored Truck's Roof
10 Bradley Cooper, Todd Phillips To Make Film About Real-Life Nevada Extortion Plot
 
 
Get-it-delivered-240