Before the World Series of Poker started, Barry Greenstein had agreed to play me in all the nine forms of poker that I had listed in my open challenge. Since I asked for a rematch in seven-card stud after he beat me, the amount of money that each of us would be risking in these matches was $5 million.
My rematch in seven-card stud was about as bad as the first match, and I found myself down 0-2 and $1 million. That's not exactly what I had planned when I asked for a rematch!
The next game that Barry chose from the list was pot-limit Omaha (PLO). Now, I didn't have very much heads-up PLO experience going into this match, so I did a little research on the game. I ran some simulations on my computer and also talked to some excellent PLO players about some of the subtleties of the game.
Right off the bat, I seized the lead and had Barry all in within the first hour of play! He won that pot and two other monster all-in pots, but I still maintained the lead when the following hand came down:
With the blinds at $1,000-$2,000, I called Barry's $6,000 button raise with K-J-9-8. The flop came Q-10-4 rainbow and I checked to Barry. He bet $10,000, just as he did every time he raised before the flop, and I decided to make it $40,000 to go.
When Barry reraised me another $80,000, I wasn't happy about it, but thought I should call to see if I could hit my straight on the turn.
The turn card was a king, filling my straight, but I checked, nonetheless. Barry then went all in, betting more than a quarter of a million dollars. After much deliberation, I finally decided to fold my hand, giving Barry credit for having A-J for the nut straight.
Now, that's not the interesting hand that I wanted to share with you, but it sets up the following hand that came much later:
I raised from the button to $6,000 with J
4
8-5. Barry reraised the pot to $18,000. Generally, that's not a very good play when heads up, since position is so important. Of course, if your hand is strong enough, there is nothing wrong with it as long as you proceed cautiously after the flop.
The flop came 9
7
6
and Barry bet $25,000. This was in line with what he had been doing throughout the match. When he had raised before the flop from the button, he would bet $10,000 when checked to, and when he had reraised from out of position, he would fire out $25,000 at every flop, whether he had something or not.
With the dummy end of the straight, I decided to play cautiously by just calling. The turn was the J
, putting a backdoor-flush possibility on the board. Barry checked and I decided to make a relatively weak-looking bet of $40,000.
Barry thought about it for a while and then finally decided to raise me another $170,000! Yikes, it was decision time for me. The last time I was facing a similar situation with the second nuts, I folded, but this situation felt slightly different.
Based on my memory of past hands that we'd played, I just didn't think Barry had the 10-8 combination in his hand.
Instead, it seemed to me that he had either top set or a hand like K-Q-10 with a diamond draw. With a hand like that,
Barry may have decided to play it fast since even if I had a straight, he'd still have a ton of outs.
What complicated my decision further was that I was doing a good job of winning the smaller pots that were less risky. If I lost this pot, I'd be giving up the lead to Barry, while folding would have us sitting close to even.
Ultimately, I went with my read, though, and raised Barry his last $108,000, for a pot of $722,000. The river was the beautiful 3 and Barry shook his head in disbelief. I was on the board, down 2-1 in our challenge match series, not to mention $500,000.
I never saw Barry's hand, but it doesn't really matter whether or not he had the set or the draw. My read of this particular situation was that he didn't have the nuts.
It all boiled down to instinct. In two similar situations with the second-nut straight, my final decision was based on some game theory, but mostly it was based on pure instinct.
In my next column, I'll again discuss a hand from my heads-up duels with Barry Greenstein, but we'll be looking at a stud eight-or-better hand.
Read Daniel's daily blog at his website www.fullcontactpoker.com.
Jennifer Tilly Vol. 18, No. 16
-
World Series of Poker Impressions – Implications for the future of the World Series of Poker
by Mike Sexton
-
On Tilt
by Jim Brier
-
Cappelletti in Las Vegas – "Stopping by" the World Series in Poker
-
An E-Mail About Poker Rules – When can the betting be reopened?
by Bob Ciaffone
-
Frequently Asked Questions About Internet Poker – Part II – More helpful information about Internet poker
by Roy Cooke
-
Raymer is a Champion Who 'Gets It' – A well-earned tribute
by Greg Dinkin
-
Pet Peeves – Undesirable traits of players
by Jan Fisher
-
The Greatest Player You've Never Heard Of – A player who just may become more well-known to the public
-
One Player's Observations on the 2005 World Series of Poker – Opinions on a variety of elements of the
-
The Finals: Chris Ferguson Vs. Phil Hellmuth Part I – The National Heads-Up Poker Championship
-
A $10,000 Second-Chance Tournament, and More Schedules
by Jeff Shulman
-
Cruising European Style – A fabulous poker cruise
-
Getting New Players Started – A fun way to get new players started in the game of poker
by Lee H. Jones
-
To Limp or Not to Limp? Arguments for and against limping with aces or kings from early position in no-limit hold'em tournaments
-
Limit Hold'em Lessons Part II – Value betting is a great strategy against loose/passive opponents
by Matt Matros
-
The Royalty of Poker: A No-Limit Hold'em Tournament Quiz – Test your skill in playing big pairs
by Tom McEvoy
-
The $5 Million Challenge Continues -A $500,000 challenge match against Barry Greenstein
-
My Time at the Final Table, World Series of Poker Style – First-time appearance at a World Series final table
by Joe Sebok
-
The Guru of Giggling – An attempt at catering to a wider audience
by Max Shapiro
-
Grading the AFC Coaches – An evaluation of NFL coaches
by Chuck Sippl
-
A Poker Correspondence, Part II – Analysis of middle-limit hold'em hands played by a friend
-
Final Thoughts on the 2005 World Series of Poker A disappointing performance at the World Series, but praise, nonetheless
-
Puerto Rican Poker – No-fold'em hold'em is everywhere
-
The Darkest Corner of Your Poker Mind – A couple of thoughts – on chasing and tells
by Roy West
-
Implausible Play in The Cincinnati Kid? A play-by-play analysis of a highly unlikely poker hand
-
Female Fascination on the Felt – Men Need Not Apply
by Lee Munzer
-
Ten Common and Costly Hold'em Errors – Part III, Common errors on the turn in limit hold'em